Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-04 disposed

Susme Builders Pvt. Ltd vs Chief Executive Officer, Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors

Bench: 2 — Deepak Gupta

In Brief

Over 800 slum dwellers who own land in Santacruz, Mumbai through a cooperative society appointed Susme Builders to rehabilitate their settlement in 1986. Despite obtaining planning permissions and constructing two buildings, Susme delayed the project for 30 years without completing it. The Society later engaged J.G. Developers by promising larger flats, but this was done through false assurances unsanctioned by authorities. The Supreme Court held that both developers failed to obtain the mandatory 70% consent of slum dwellers and were thus ineligible. Susme was responsible for unjustified delay; J.G. Developers obtained consent fraudulently. The Court directed the SRA to invite fresh competitive bids from qualified developers with stringent performance guarantees, ensuring terms at least as favourable as previously offered to the long-suffering slum dwellers."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Slum Rehabilitation Housing Law Administrative Law Property Law Cooperative Societies Real Estate Development Consumer Protection Public Interest Litigation Constitutional Law (Article 142) Delay and Laches

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login