In Brief
The Supreme Court held that live-streaming of court proceedings, particularly those of constitutional and national importance, is manifestly in public interest and a natural extension of the principle of open justice. Drawing from Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution, the Court recognized that citizens have a constitutional right to access court proceedings and receive information about judicial functioning. The judgment endorsed a phased implementation starting with constitutional cases, laying down guidelines that exclude matrimonial and sensitive cases, ensure a brief broadcast delay, retain judicial discretion over suspension, and protect privacy and court dignity. Comparative analysis of international practices informed the framework. The Court directed that comprehensive rules be framed under Article 145, striking a balance between transparency and protection of administration of justice.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.