Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-09-22 allowed

SWEETY KUMARI vs THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

Bench: 2 — J.K. Maheshwari, K.V. Viswanathan

In Brief

Three candidates challenged High Court orders rejecting their applications to the Bihar Judicial Service. Sweety Kumari and Vikramaditya Mishra were rejected for not producing original character certificates (though photocopies existed); Aditi was rejected for lack of a law degree certificate. The Supreme Court held that producing originals at interview is directory, not mandatory under the recruitment rules. Since all three candidates scored above cutoff marks and were merit-listed, their candidatures could not be rejected on procedural grounds alone. The Court directed their accommodation, relying on the principle that possession of qualifications at application time—not proof—determines eligibility.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Public Service Commission Judicial Service Recruitment Procedural Compliance Equal Protection Merit-Based Selection

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login