Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-02-16 allowed

T.A. Kathiru Kunju vs Jacob Mathai & Anr

Bench: 2 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

An advocate engaged to file a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act regarding a dishonoured cheque handed it over to investigating police instead and failed to obtain an acknowledgment. The Disciplinary Committee found him guilty of gross negligence and imposed reprimand with monetary penalty. The Supreme Court set aside the order, holding that the failure to obtain an acknowledgment amounted to mere negligence, not gross negligence. Gross negligence requires conduct involving moral turpitude or willful disregard for client interests; mere negligence unaccompanied by moral delinquency does not constitute professional misconduct warranting punishment under the Advocates Act.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Advocates Act Professional Conduct Disciplinary Proceedings Negligence Moral Turpitude Cheque/Negotiable Instruments Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login