Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-20 dismissed

Thangasamy vs State of Tamil Nadu

Bench: 2 — Dinesh Maheshwari

In Brief

On 24 February 2001, the appellant drove a government passenger bus in a negligent and rash manner, causing an accident near Korampallam on the Tuticorin–Tirunelveli Road that killed four persons and injured three. The appellant's defence was that he was not the driver and that an oncoming lorry caused the accident. The Supreme Court upheld his conviction under Sections 279, 337, and 304-A IPC, finding that five prosecution witnesses consistently identified him as the driver. The Court held that identity need not depend on formal parade when witnesses present at the scene positively identify the accused in court. It rejected the plea for reduced sentence, emphasizing that rash driving causing death requires proportionate, deterrent punishment to discourage such offences.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Motor Vehicles and Road Safety Negligent Driving Causation Identification of Accused Sentencing Principles

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login