Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-01-28 allowed

The Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Anr vs K. Sudheesh Kumar & Ors

Bench: 2 — M. R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

In Brief

The Director of Enforcement appealed a High Court decision that granted retired government employees (respondents) a higher grade pay of Rs. 6600 under the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP). The Supreme Court held that the MACP Scheme envisages placement at the immediate next higher grade pay in the pay hierarchy, not the grade pay of the next promotional post. Clause 8.1 of the Scheme treated the same grade pay (Rs. 5400) in different pay bands as separate, so respondents were entitled to Rs. 5400, not Rs. 6600. The Court held the High Court had no jurisdiction to modify a Government policy scheme based on expert recommendations. However, acknowledging the retired employees had already received the higher pension for years, the Court ordered no recovery of the difference prior to December 2021, though future pensions would be fixed at the correct grade pay.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Service Pay and Allowances Administrative Law Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) Pension

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login