Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-11-10 allowed

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GOSIKHURD PROJECT AMBADI, BHANDARA, MAHARASHTRA VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION vs MAHESH AND OTHERS

Bench: 2 — A.M. Khanwilkar, Sanjiv Khanna

In Brief

In this land acquisition case, the Supreme Court interpreted Section 24(1)(a) of the 2013 Act concerning compensation determination for proceedings initiated under the repealed 1894 Act. The Court held that the twelve-month period in Section 25 of the 2013 Act (not the two-year period under Section 11A of the 1894 Act) applies to such awards. The limitation period commences from 1st January 2014 when the 2013 Act came into force. Periods during which court orders inhibited authority action must be excluded. The Court upheld the award dated 30th October 2014 as valid, even if backdated, since it was made within the extended deadline. The acquisition proceedings did not lapse, and the High Court's judgment setting aside the award was reversed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Statutory Interpretation Limitation Periods Administrative Law Public Purpose

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login