Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-01-07 allowed

THE PROPERTY COMPANY (P) LTD vs ROHINTEN DADDY MAZDA

Bench: 2 — J. B. Pardiwala, R. Mahadevan

In Brief

A shareholder inherited 20 company shares through his mother's will but waited 23 years after obtaining probate to request registration. The company refused registration in 2013. The shareholder filed an appeal 249 days late to the Company Law Board (later replaced by the National Company Law Tribunal). The Court held that delay cannot be condoned because the Company Law Board lacks statutory power to extend filing deadlines. Only the Limitation Act principles apply to courts, not quasi-judicial bodies, unless expressly authorized by law. The shareholder's remedy had already expired under previous law before new legislation took effect.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Corporate Law Limitation and Procedure Quasi-Judicial Bodies Shareholder Rights Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login