Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-12-04 allowed

THE STATE OF ODISHA vs MANJU NAIK

Bench: 3 — R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna, Hrishikesh Roy

In Brief

The State of Odisha challenged a tribunal and high court order directing it to sanction invalid pension to the widow of a deceased government employee who had not completed the mandatory ten-year qualifying service period. The Supreme Court held that the minimum qualifying service of ten years under Rules 47(2)(b) and 47(5)(i) of the Orissa Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 is a prerequisite for all types of pension, including invalid pension under Rule 39. The rules must be read harmoniously and as a whole. Since the employee failed to meet the qualifying service requirement, service gratuity (the statutory alternate relief) was the appropriate entitlement. The appeal was allowed and the impugned orders were set aside.">

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Pension Law Civil Services Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Service Benefits Qualifying Service

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login