Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-02-12 partly_allowed

U.P.S.R.T.C vs Mamta (Km.) & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

A 49-year-old motorcyclist died in a collision with a state transport bus on a highway. The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal awarded his family ₹24.73 lakhs in compensation. The High Court dismissed the bus operator's appeal in a single cryptic paragraph without examining the facts, evidence, or the appellant's arguments on contributory negligence. The Supreme Court held that a first appellate court must examine all evidence, address every submission, and record reasoned findings. Since the High Court's judgment violated these procedural requirements, the Court allowed the appeal partly and remanded the case for fresh hearing before the High Court.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Motor Vehicles Appellate Procedure Civil Procedure Accident Claims Judicial Accountability

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login