In Brief
A respondent was acquitted in a criminal case involving kidnapping for ransom after prosecution witnesses turned hostile. He was provisionally selected for the post of Constable in CISF but was later rejected by a Screening Committee, which found his acquittal was 'on benefit of doubt' rather than 'honourable'. The High Court's Writ Division allowed his petition directing his appointment with consequential benefits. The Supreme Court held that an acquittal 'giving benefit of doubt' does not entitle a candidate to government employment in disciplined forces. The employer has the right to assess the nature of acquittal and candidate suitability; a Screening Committee's decision cannot be interfered with unless mala fide. Appeal allowed, impugned orders set aside.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.