Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-22 dismissed

Union of India vs Board of Control for Cricket in India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

The Supreme Court affirmed a High Court decision striking down encryption requirements on cricket broadcasting signals. Under the Sports Broadcasting Signals Act, 2007, content rights holders must share live broadcasts with Prasar Bharati (state broadcaster) for retransmission on its terrestrial and DTH networks only. The Court held that this mandatory sharing obligation does not extend to cable operators beyond Prasar Bharati's own networks. Although cable operators must carry Doordarshan channels under the Cable Act, 1995, this 'must carry' obligation does not expand the 'must share' mandate. The Court affirmed that the two statutes operate independently without cross-controlling effect, protecting both public access to sporting events and legitimate broadcasting rights."/> </invoke>

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Sports Law Broadcasting Rights Intellectual Property Telecommunications and Cable Services Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login