Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Wednesday, 23 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-22 dismissed

Union of India vs Board of Control for Cricket in India & Ors

Bench: 2 — Ranjan Gogoi

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that broadcasters holding exclusive cricket rights must share live signals with Prasar Bharati (India's public broadcaster) under the Sports Broadcasting Signals Act, 2007, but only for transmission via Prasar Bharati's own terrestrial and DTH networks. Cable operators cannot retransmit these signals to their paying subscribers without separate payment. The Court rejected arguments that the Cable Television Networks Act, 1995 — which requires cable operators to carry certain designated Doordarshan channels — expanded the mandatory sharing obligation. The Court emphasised that expropriatory legislation must be strictly construed and confined to its express language, and that two statutes operating in different contexts should not be read to control each other absent clear legislative intent.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Sports Law Broadcasting Rights Intellectual Property Copyright Constitutional Law Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login