Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-11-18 allowed

Union of India vs Manraj Enterprises

Bench: 2 — M.R. Shah

In Brief

The Union of India challenged an arbitral award that granted pendente lite and future interest to a contractor despite a contractual clause (clause 16(2) of the GCC) barring interest on amounts payable under the contract. The Court held that when parties expressly prohibit interest payment in their contract, the arbitrator cannot award pendente lite or future interest on amounts due under that contract. The clause's bar applies to all amounts payable to the contractor, not merely earnest money and security deposits. The arbitrator, being bound by the contract's terms, has no power to award interest contrary to the parties' express agreement. The Court quashed the arbitral award and the High Court's orders upholding it.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Contract Law Interest Award Arbitral Award Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Pendente Lite Interest General Conditions of Contract

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login