In Brief
Union of India, represented by the Railway administration, refused to appoint an arbitrator for disputes raised by Pradeep Vinod Construction Company, claiming the matters were settled via a 'No Claim' certificate and supplementary accord. The Supreme Court held that Clause 64 of the General Conditions of Contract mandates arbitration for disputes arising from contract terms or the Railway's failure to decide timely, unless the dispute falls within express exceptions. The mere issuance of a settlement certificate does not preclude arbitration if the underlying dispute arose from the contract. The Court directed appointment of the arbitrator as required."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.