In Brief
V. Dinu challenged a High Court order that remanded his case to the trial court for fresh evidence under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Supreme Court held that the High Court was not justified in ordering remand when no further evidence was required to decide the main question—whether the suit should be decreed. The Court set aside the remand order and directed the High Court to decide the appeal afresh on its merits, without additional evidence proceedings.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.