Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-08-28 partly_allowed

V.S. PALANIVEL vs P. SRIRAM, CS, LIQUIDATOR, ETC

Bench: 2 — Hima Kohli, Ahsanuddin Amanullah

In Brief

A shareholder of a company in liquidation challenged an e-auction of company property by the Liquidator, seeking to set aside the sale and declare the sale certificate void. The Auction Purchaser won the bid but delayed depositing the balance amount beyond the 90-day deadline due to the Covid-19 lockdown and Income Tax attachment on the property. The Supreme Court held that while the 90-day payment timeline under IBBI Regulations is normally mandatory, the extraordinary circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic and the Supreme Court's order extending limitation periods entitled the Auction Purchaser to relief. The Court declined to cancel the sale given substantial investments made and the appellant's dilatory conduct, instead directing the Auction Purchaser to deposit an additional 50% of the differential amount between the valuers' estimate and the reserve price, with interest at 9% per annum.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Liquidation E-Auction Sale of Assets Covid-19 Pandemic Limitation of Time IBBI Regulations Mandatory vs Directory Rules Inherent Powers of Tribunal Equity and Estoppel

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login