Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Friday, 30 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-21 allowed

Vedanta Limited vs Emirates Trading Agency LLC

Bench: 2 — Navin Sinha

In Brief

A supplier (Vedanta) entered negotiations with a buyer (Emirates Trading Agency) over a phosphoric acid supply contract. The buyer obtained a tender order and sought backup support. The buyer sent a draft agreement; the supplier made a counter-proposal changing the quantity and supply period. The supplier never formally accepted or signed the draft agreement. When the deal fell through, the buyer sued for breach of contract and damages. The Supreme Court held that no concluded contract had been formed, as the supplier's counter-proposal with material alterations prevented a meeting of minds. Without a valid, concluded contract, no claim for breach and damages could be maintained under the Indian Contract Act. The Court allowed the supplier's appeals and set aside the judgment against it."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contract Law Civil Procedure Review Petitions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login