In Brief
This appeal concerns the remission eligibility of a convict who claimed discriminatory treatment compared to similarly situated convicts. The Supreme Court held that when considering remission under Section 433-A of the CrPC, the State must apply whichever guideline—from conviction time or consideration time—is more liberal to the convict. Finding unequal treatment, the Court set aside the State's order and directed it to reconsider the appellant's remission claim afresh within three months, applying the applicable guidelines fairly to ensure equal protection.",
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.