Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-12-08 dismissed

Vijay Kumar and Another vs Bal Krishan and Others

Bench: 2 — Navin Sinha

In Brief

Three parties jointly purchased land and filed a revenue suit under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition Act seeking declaration as co-bhumidhars. The suit was decreed, holding them jointly entitled. Later, in a separate partition suit, one party claimed only a 1/10th share. The High Court struck down this finding as perverse, because it contradicted the final decree declaring equal co-bhumidari rights and ignored the absence of any actual partition between the parties. The Supreme Court upheld this, confirming that the three parties remain equal co-bhumidhars (1/3rd share each) absent evidence of partition.", <parameter name="cited_cases">[]

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Law Revenue Law Zamindari Abolition Bhumidari Rights Partition Declaration of Rights

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login