Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-03 allowed

Vijay Kumar & Ors vs Om Parkash

Bench: 2 — Banumathi

In Brief

A buyer and seller agreed in November 2007 to sell a shop for Rs 26 lakhs; the buyer paid Rs 4 lakhs as earnest money with the balance due on 31 March 2008. When the sale deed was not executed, the buyer sued for specific performance. While the trial court dismissed the suit for failure to prove readiness and willingness to pay, the appellate courts reversed and granted the decree. The Supreme Court allowed the seller's appeal, holding that the buyer failed to prove capacity to pay the balance amount at the material time; mere oral claims of borrowing from friends without documentary proof were insufficient. The Court ordered return of the earnest money with interest but denied specific performance.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contract Law Specific Performance Sale of Immovable Property Evidence Burden of Proof

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login