Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-10-03 partly_allowed

Vijay Kumar & Ors vs Om Parkash

Bench: 1 — Banumathi

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed a dispute over specific performance for the sale of a shop. The buyer (respondent) and seller (appellants) agreed on the sale on 9 November 2007 for Rs. 26 lakhs, with Rs. 4 lakhs paid as earnest money and Rs. 22 lakhs due by 31 March 2008. When the buyer sued for specific performance, the Court held that he failed to prove readiness and willingness to pay the balance amount, as he produced no bank statements or evidence of funds at the time of filing. The Court set aside the lower courts' decree, but ordered return of the earnest money with interest and allowed withdrawal of the deposited Rs. 22 lakhs with accrued interest.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Sale of Property Specific Performance Contract Law Readiness and Willingness

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login