Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-04 dismissed

Vijendra Singh & Ors vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Bench: 2 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

Two men were convicted of murder under IPC Sections 302 and 34 for killing a student in his shed near a tube-well. Eyewitnesses testified they saw all four accused emerging from the shed carrying weapons (pistols, ballam, and lathi) after hearing gunshots. The High Court upheld their conviction. The appellants argued there was no common intention and that they (carrying blunt weapons) could not be liable for a gunshot death. Held: Section 34 IPC provides for joint liability when common intention is proved through circumstances (weapons, simultaneous presence, coordinated action). Related eyewitnesses are credible natural witnesses. One appellant was found to be a juvenile and released from custody.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Indian Penal Code Section 34 IPC Common Intention Constructive Liability Eyewitness Evidence Related Witnesses Juvenile Justice Murder

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login