In Brief
Vikram Singh challenged the cancellation of his candidature for a constable position on grounds that he had suppressed information regarding involvement in criminal cases. The Supreme Court remitted the matter to the Commissioner of Police for fresh consideration. The Court applied the principles established in Avtar Singh v. Union of India, which sets out a comprehensive framework for determining whether suppression of criminal history warrants cancellation of candidature. The employer must consider the nature of the case, whether conviction or acquittal had been recorded, and provide the candidate an opportunity to be heard. The Commissioner was directed to consider the appellant's detailed representation within four months and pass a reasoned order.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.