In Brief
Vineeta Sharma's civil appeal to the Supreme Court raised substantive issues on which conflicting Supreme Court decisions existed. The Delhi High Court had granted a fitness certificate under the Constitution's Article 133(1)(a) citing contradictory rulings in three prior cases. The Supreme Court accepted the appeal, finding the certificate properly granted on grounds of conflicting precedent. A three-judge bench was constituted to hear the matter finally. The court adjourned proceedings to allow parties time to prepare comprehensive arguments on the substantive issues.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.