Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-12-05 dismissed

Vivek Mudgil vs State of U.P. & Ors

Bench: 2 — R. Subhash Reddy

In Brief

Vivek Mudgil applied for promotion to Principal after being selected in 2002, but when appointed in 2008, his appointment was cancelled because he lacked the required ten years of teaching experience—he had only 9 years and 3 months. He argued his study leave in Czechoslovakia (1992–1996) should count toward experience. The Supreme Court held that study leave, even if increments were granted, cannot be counted as teaching experience. The Court also ruled that mandatory qualifications must be possessed on the application deadline. An exemption granted later during proceedings could not retrospectively cure the disqualification. The appeal was dismissed; the issue of exemption power under the Act was left open.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Education Law Administrative Law Service Law Qualification Requirements

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login