Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-17 partly_allowed

X (Ms.) vs State of Telangana and Anr

Bench: 3 — D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

A film producer accused of rape, outraging modesty, criminal intimidation and criminal confinement was granted anticipatory bail, which was later cancelled on the ground of non-disclosure regarding the 2G Spectrum case. The High Court then granted regular bail. The Supreme Court held that bail once granted should not be cancelled without cogent, overwhelming circumstances based on supervening events. The Court found no supervening circumstance justifying cancellation. The accused's eight-month record on anticipatory bail without misconduct, and the delay in filing the complaint favoured grant of bail. The Court affirmed bail but enhanced the personal bond quantum from ₹50,000 to ₹10 lakhs.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Bail Sexual Assault Anticipatory Bail Cancellation Supervening Circumstances

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login