Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-09-14 allowed

Yogesh Aggarwal vs Aneja Consultancy (A Part of Aneja Group) & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Yogesh Aggarwal challenged an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) directing him to pay cheques signed by him, plus interest. The Supreme Court held that the complaint was not maintainable because it was filed by an unregistered entity (Investor Forum Aneja Group) without obtaining prior permission from the forum as required by Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Additionally, since Aneja Consultancy was a sole proprietorship and Aggarwal was merely an employee, he could not be held personally liable. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the NCDRC order, dismissed the complaint, and ordered refund of any deposited amount with accrued interest."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login