Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-08-12 partly_allowed

A. KARUNANITHI vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Bench: 2 — Pankaj Mithal, Prasanna B. Varale

In Brief

A. Karunanithi, a Village Administrative Officer, allegedly demanded Rs. 500 as bribe from a citizen seeking a Community Certificate in 2004. His colleague P. Karunanithi accepted the marked currency. Both were convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Supreme Court upheld A-1's conviction for demanding and receiving bribe, confirming both demand and receipt were proved. However, A-2's conviction was set aside as he merely accepted money on A-1's direction without himself demanding it—an act insufficient for conviction absent an abetment charge. A-1's sentence was reduced to the statutory minimum of one year for both offences, considering the case's age and small amount involved.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Prevention of Corruption Demand and Receipt of Bribe Sentencing Abetment Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login