Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-05-05 allowed

Ghanshyam Sukhdeo Gaikwad & Ors vs Bajaj Auto Ltd. & Ors

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

Workmen sought reinstatement after being retrenched by Bajaj Auto Ltd. After a protracted litigation spanning over two decades, involving Labour Court, Industrial Court, Industrial Tribunal, and High Court proceedings, this appeal arose. While the Industrial Tribunal directed reinstatement without backwages and the High Court upheld the validity of retrenchment, the Supreme Court took a pragmatic view. Given that 59 of 65 litigants had already accepted voluntary retirement, the workmen's age, and that wages had been paid continuously since 2002 without work, the Court invoked Article 142 to award Rs. 10 Lakhs to each appellant as a lump sum settlement, plus gratuity calculated on current wages, in the interest of complete justice."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Labour Law Industrial Disputes Reinstatement Retrenchment Settlement Voluntary Retirement Scheme

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login