In Brief
The Supreme Court dismissed a miscellaneous application filed five years after disposal of the original writ petition. The applicant, having previously won a contempt case, sought protection and fresh directions based on alleged subsequent threats. The Court held that once a writ petition is finally disposed of, the Court becomes functus officio and lacks jurisdiction to entertain miscellaneous applications seeking new relief. Post-disposal applications are maintainable only to correct errors or clarify executory orders that have become impossible to implement. For protection concerns, the applicant must file a fresh writ petition before the High Court, not revive concluded proceedings."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.