Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-20 partly_allowed

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay vs Union of India and Anr

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay filed writ petitions seeking mandamus to fill judicial vacancies and increase judicial strength in accordance with Law Commission recommendations. The Supreme Court found that the relief sought was already in the process of implementation: the Government had recently increased High Court posts, a judicial committee had been constituted, and a process for filling vacancies was underway. The Court disposed of the petitions, reasoning that filling existing vacancies should precede creation of new posts, and granted liberty to approach the Court at a later stage upon completion of implementation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Judicial Administration Judicial Vacancies Writ Petition Mandamus

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login