Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-08-09 disposed

Ajay Kumar Singh & Anr vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul

In Brief

The case concerns the seniority of Assistant Engineers in Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities between promotees (Junior Engineers promoted under 50% quota) and direct appointees (recruited externally). The core dispute arose because the promotees' promotions lacked mandatory consultation with the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission as required by Article 320(3) of the Constitution. The Court held that while such consultation was omitted irregularly, it was not fatal and could be cured prospectively. The Court directed the State Government to obtain retrospective UPPSC consultation within two months. The promotees would retain senior positions if the UPPSC gave a favourable opinion; otherwise, individual candidates advised against could be excluded from the list.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Public Service Commission Seniority Promotion Administrative Law Service Rules Consultation Requirements

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login