Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-05-03 allowed

ALAUDDIN & ORS vs THE STATE OF ASSAM & ANR

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Ujjal Bhuyan

In Brief

The appellants, accused of murdering Sahabuddin Choudhury in February 2013, were convicted by the trial court and the conviction was confirmed by the High Court. The Supreme Court set aside the conviction and acquitted the appellants. The Court found three critical defects: first, the High Court confirmed guilt of only four persons, insufficient to constitute an unlawful assembly of five or more required under IPC Section 141 for invoking Section 149; second, the eyewitness evidence was unreliable, with material omissions and contradictions not properly recorded under Section 162 of the CrPC; and third, the theory of 'last seen together' failed because after being seen with the appellants at 4 p.m., the deceased attended a Congress meeting with other persons, breaking the causal chain. The Court ruled that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Evidence Murder Eyewitness Testimony Contradiction and Omission Last Seen Together Unlawful Assembly

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login