Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Tuesday, 04 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-04-24 partly_allowed

ARVIND SINGH vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Bench: 3 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra, Hemant Gupta

In Brief

In this criminal appeal, the Supreme Court affirmed the conviction of Rajesh Daware and Arvind Singh for the kidnapping and murder of an 8-year-old boy, Yug Chandak, son of a dentist in Nagpur. The Court found overwhelming circumstantial evidence linking both accused to the crime: they were seen with the victim at five locations from 16:00 to 18:00 hours on 1 September 2014, the victim was recovered dead under a bridge, and a ransom call was made demanding payment. The Court rejected the argument that A-1 was in unlawful police custody and held that both accused shared common intention to kidnap for ransom. However, the Court reduced the death sentence to life imprisonment with no remission for 25 years, holding that while the crime was heinous, the motive was to obtain ransom rather than cause death, placing it outside the 'rarest of rare' category. The judgment invoked the principle of 'special sentencing' permitting life imprisonment as an alternative to death.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Murder Kidnapping for Ransom Circumstantial Evidence Evidence Act Section 106 Common Intention Death Penalty Life Imprisonment Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login