Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-10 dismissed

Balaram Vishnu Subramani vs Union of India & Anr

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the Indian Institutes of Technology's decision to award bonus marks to all candidates in JEE (Advanced) 2017 for two questions affected by printing inconsistencies. While the petitioner argued that students who answered correctly received fewer marks than those who didn't attempt the questions, the Court found that uniform bonus marking was the fairest approach in a large-scale examination with 1,56,000 candidates and negative marking provisions. The Court distinguished the Guru Nanak Dev University precedent as inapplicable to such complex situations and vacated its earlier stay on admissions and counselling. It directed the examination body to implement a foolproof mechanism for future question paper preparation to prevent such errors.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Education Law Examination Administration Writ of Mandamus Administrative Law Judicial Restraint JEE Advanced

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login