Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-10 dismissed

Balaram Vishnu Subramani vs Union of India & Anr

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the award of bonus marks in JEE (Advanced) 2017 examinations. Due to printing inconsistencies in Chemistry Question 29 and Mathematics Question 39, the examining body awarded +3 and +4 bonus marks respectively to all candidates to ensure equal treatment. Petitioners argued this unfairly benefited students who did not attempt questions. The Court held that Guru Nanak Dev University precedent was distinguishable given the scale (156,000 candidates vs. 10,000 previously) and negative marking provisions. The uniform bonus approach was reasonable. The Court vacated the interim stay on admissions and directed authorities to implement foolproof mechanisms to prevent future errors.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Writ Jurisdiction Educational Law Examination Conduct

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login