Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-09-19 partly_allowed

Baljeet Singh (D) Thr Lrs. & Ors vs Union of India Through Land Acquisition Collector & Anr

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Landowners of villages Mundka and Bakkarwala appealed for enhanced compensation following land acquisitions under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The High Court had determined differential compensation rates (a belting system) for different land categories in the 1997 acquisition, and fixed rates for subsequent acquisitions in 2003 and 2005. The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeals, removing the belting system and establishing uniform compensation of Rs. 2,49,408 per bigha for all land acquired in village Mundka in 1997. However, the Court rejected claims for 15% cumulative annual appreciation, holding that flat-rate appreciation based on contemporaneous sale deeds was appropriate, and that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act did not apply where compensation had already been determined and paid.</summary_100> </invoke>

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Property Valuation Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login