Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-03-11 partly_allowed

Bhagyan Das vs State of Uttarakhand & Anr

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The appellant, a senior citizen, was convicted of criminal breach of trust and cheating (Sections 409 and 420B IPC) relating to an incident from 1991-92, though the complaint was filed belatedly in 2004. He argued the offence was compoundable under the Criminal Procedure Code and sought compounding. While acknowledging the compoundable nature, the Court held that it retained discretion to refuse compounding where public interest was involved. Considering the appellant's age, the Court partly allowed the appeal by modifying the sentence imposed rather than allowing full compounding.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Compounding of Offences Sentencing Mitigation Abuse of Position Discretion of Court

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login