Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-05-04 allowed

Bibi Parwana Khatoon @ Parwana Khatoon and another vs State of Bihar

Bench: 2 — Prafulla C. Pant

In Brief

A woman died of burn injuries in her in-laws' house. The trial court convicted four family members—the husband, father-in-law, sister-in-law, and brother-in-law—for dowry death under Section 304B read with Section 34 IPC. The High Court upheld the convictions of all except the father-in-law. On appeal, the Supreme Court found that the sister-in-law and brother-in-law lived in a different village (Sabutar), not with the deceased (Kali Prasad Tola). Multiple defence witnesses and public documents (residence certificate, PAN, service book) corroborated this separation. Without evidence of their presence or any specific role assigned in the FIR, common intention could not be established. The Court set aside their conviction and acquitted them, finding the charge not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Dowry Death Evidence Circumstantial Evidence Common Intention

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login