Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-01-19 partly_allowed

Bobbili Ramakrishna Raju Yadav & Ors vs State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By Its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P. Hyderabad, A.P. & Anr

Bench: 3 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

A man died under suspicious circumstances following his 2007 marriage, leading to criminal proceedings under dowry and IPC provisions. Later, the deceased's father filed a private complaint under Dowry Prohibition Act Section 6, alleging non-return of dowry paid to the groom and his family (six accused). The Court held that absent specific allegations that dowry was actually entrusted to the groom's parents and sisters (who lived separately from the couple), Section 6 charges could not stand. Where dowry articles customarily accompany the bride to her matrimonial home, mere payment at the in-laws' house does not create legal entrustment. The appeal was partly allowed, quashing charges against the groom's family members while proceedings against the groom continued.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Dowry Prohibition Act Criminal Procedure Section 482 CrPC Quashing of Proceedings Dowry Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login