Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-05 allowed

BRAHMA SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao, Deepak Gupta

In Brief

Employees of the Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee and Supreme Court Legal Services Committee sought recognition of their entire service—including periods before 2000—as qualifying service for pension calculation. The Union of India argued benefits could only be counted from the Rules' promulgation date (03.07.2000). The Supreme Court held that regular employees rendering continuous service must have their entire tenure counted for retiral benefits, without distinction based on regulatory dates. The Court also rejected a procedural objection, finding that claims not expressly decided in an earlier petition remain maintainable. The petition was allowed, directing full pension benefit credit for all service periods.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Service Law Pension and Retiral Benefits Statutory Rules Writ Petition Government Employees

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login