Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-08-06 allowed

CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION vs HARI RAM

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi, A.S. Bopanna

In Brief

In 1996, the Chandigarh Administration allotted a commercial booth to Hari Ram on a 99-year lease for Rs.70,500. The respondent failed to pay three instalments and ground rent due in 1997–1999 despite 26 opportunities. The Administration cancelled the allotment and evicted him in 2007. The High Court set aside the eviction, directing return of his deposit to enable him to pay outstanding dues. The Supreme Court allowed the Administration's appeal, holding that consistent default cannot be rewarded. However, balancing both parties' interests, the Court required payment at the 2010 market value (Rs.12,77,950) rather than current 2015 value (Rs.26,84,348), giving six months to pay.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Landlord and Tenant Law Lease Cancellation Public Premises Eviction Property Law Administrative Law Doctrine of Proportionality

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login