Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-09-06 dismissed

Commissioner of Commercial Tax, U.P vs A.R. Thermosets (Pvt.) Ltd

Bench: 2 — Dipak Misra

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that bitumen emulsion falls within Entry 22 of Schedule II of the VAT Act, 2008, which refers to 'bitumen'. The Court held that bitumen emulsion is merely a processed form of bitumen retaining the same chemical composition, commercial identity, and end use as solid bitumen. Applying the common parlance and composition tests, the Court concluded that 'bitumen' is a generic term encompassing all types of bitumen. Since the product clearly fell within the specific Entry, the Revenue could not resort to the residuary Entry. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Taxation VAT Commodity Classification Interpretation of Statutes Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login