Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-18 dismissed

Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad vs Equinox Solution Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

The Revenue appealed after the High Court dismissed its case on the ground that no substantial question of law was involved. The assessee had sold its entire manufacturing business as a going concern (slump sale) on 31 December 1990 for Rs 58.53 lakh. The Assessing Officer sought to tax it under Section 50(2) as short-term capital gain; the assessee claimed long-term treatment under Section 48. The Supreme Court held that Section 50(2) applies only to transfers of individual or blocks of assets, not to slump sales of entire businesses. Since the business was owned for over six years and sold in one go with all assets and liabilities, it constitutes a long-term capital asset and must be taxed accordingly. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Capital Gains Slump Sale Long-term Capital Asset Section 50(2) Business Sale

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login