Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-07 allowed

Competition Commission of India vs Co-Ordination Committee & Ors

Bench: 2 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the Competition Commission's finding that an association of artists and technicians (Coordination Committee) and a producers' association (EIMPA) violated competition law by collectively pressuring television channels not to broadcast a Hindi serial dubbed in Bengali. Though nominally trade unions, these bodies acted as associations of enterprises engaged in film and television production and distribution. Their coordinated efforts—including threatening non-cooperation—restricted market supply and consumer choice. The court rejected the argument that language protection or trade union rights exempted them from competition law. The relevant market encompassed the entire film and television industry of West Bengal, not merely broadcast services. The court held that collective conduct foreclosing entry and restricting supply violated the Competition Act, regardless of formal or informal nature.",

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Competition Law Anti-Competitive Agreements Trade Unions Market Definition Relevant Market Collective Action Consumer Protection Broadcast and Media Economic Activity

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login