Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-04-17 allowed

Competition Commission of India vs Thomas Cook (India) Ltd. & Anr

Bench: 2 — Arun Mishra

In Brief

The Competition Commission of India appealed against the Competition Appellate Tribunal's reversal of a penalty for non-compliance with combination notification rules. Thomas Cook India Ltd., its subsidiary, and Sterling Holiday Resorts had executed multiple interconnected transactions—demerger, amalgamation, share subscriptions, and market purchases—but notified only the merger and amalgamation. The Supreme Court held that these transactions constituted a single composite combination and must be notified together. Market purchases could not be isolated to claim exemption. The Court upheld the Rs. 1 crore penalty, holding that breach of statutory obligation attracts penalty without requiring proof of malice or intent. Substance prevails over form in assessing combinations.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Mergers & Acquisitions Competition Law Antitrust Regulatory Compliance Combination Notification Target-based Exemption Penalty Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login