Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-26 disposed

DLF Homes Panchkula (P) Ltd. through its Authorised Signatory Mr. Shiv Kumar vs Sushila Devi and Anr. etc

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

DLF Homes Panchkula failed to deliver promised apartments within 24 months. Buyers sought refunds with interest or delayed possession compensation. The State and National Consumer Commissions ordered refunds at varying interest rates. The Supreme Court, relying on principles established in Himanshu Arora's case, disposed of these consolidated appeals by standardizing interest at 9% per annum. For refund cases, interest runs from deposit date to refund; for possession cases, from three years after the agreement (the developer's full contractual period). The Court directed payment within six weeks and addressed specific cases, including succession issues following an allottee's death and a transfer case pending regular court resolution.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Real Estate and Housing Refund and Compensation Interest and Damages Limitation and Delay Succession and Inheritance

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login