Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-26 partly_allowed

DLF Homes Panchkula (P) Ltd. through its Authorised Signatory Mr. Shiv Kumar vs Sushila Devi and Anr. etc

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

DLF Homes Panchkula failed to deliver apartments in its DLF Valley project within the promised 24 months, leading to consumer complaints. Some buyers sought refunds with interest; others demanded possession. The State Commission awarded 15% interest and compensation; the National Commission reduced it to 9%. The Supreme Court aligned this case with the Himanshu Arora decision, ordering: (1) interest at 9% per annum on refunded amounts from deposit till refund date; (2) for possession cases, compensation @ 9% calculated only after 3 years from the agreement (the permitted development period); (3) amounts previously paid under the agreement to be credited. The court also directed distribution of a deceased allottee's refund among heirs pending formal entitlement determination.</summary_100> </invoke>

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Consumer Protection Real Estate / Housing Deficiency of Service Refund and Compensation Interest Delayed Delivery Article 227 Judicial Review

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login