Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-01-06 allowed

Ganesh vs State of Tamil Nadu and Anr

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

A man accused of rape under Section 376 IPC claimed juvenility. The High Court set aside the trial court's finding that he was a juvenile and ordered reconsideration, directing a medical examination. The Supreme Court reversed the High Court, holding that age determination must be based on documentary evidence (school or birth certificates) in a prescribed order, with medical examination only as a last resort when documents are unavailable or fabricated. The court emphasized that its findings based on documentary evidence are conclusive. For continuing offences like rape, juvenility is determined by reference to the date of the last incident, not the first.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Juvenile Justice Criminal Procedure Age Determination Statutory Interpretation Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login